Pakistan RLNG Market Design Diagnostic — Improved v2

Pakistan Gas Reform · RLNG Market-Design Diagnostic · Issue Tree

Pakistan RLNG Market Design Diagnostic: Surplus, Weak Pull, and Broken Cost Causation

Demand-backed procurement · Neutral carriage · Cost-causative tariffs · Segment-wise RLNG actualisation

The mind map shows that Pakistan’s RLNG imbalance is not simply a question of supply shortage or import dependence. The deeper issue is market design: fixed LNG/RLNG procurement obligations are confronting weakly committed and increasingly variable downstream offtake, especially in the power sector. Historical LNG consumption has remained rangebound at around 6–8 mmtpa, while the updated SNGPL balance indicates sizeable RLNG surplus risk of 414–703 MMCFD across 2027–2031, equivalent to roughly 50–85 cargoes per year. The issue is therefore not “more supply” or “less supply” in isolation; it is the absence of firm nominations, back-to-back obligations, neutral transport, ring-fenced cost attribution and economic market clearing.

100%
Historic consumption
6–8 mmtpa
Pakistan LNG demand stayed rangebound in the past five years.
Regas capacity
9.06 mmtpa
Current operating regasification capacity; the constraint is demand absorption, not terminal capacity.
SNGPL RLNG surplus
414–703 MMCFD
Projected annual surplus range across 2027–2031 under updated demand assumptions.
Cargo equivalent
50–85 / year
Annual surplus cargo equivalent across 2027–2031 on a 3,000 MMCF per cargo basis.
Drag to pan · Click branch to toggle · Scroll to move
Conclusion: Pakistan’s RLNG imbalance is a structural market-clearing failure, not a physical supply constraint. LNG procurement was intended to displace expensive oil-based generation and strengthen energy security; however, downstream offtake has weakened while procurement and terminal obligations remain relatively rigid. On updated SNGPL balance assumptions, RLNG surplus risk is 414–703 MMCFD during 2027–2031, equivalent to roughly 50–85 cargoes per year. A durable response requires integrated gas-power planning, demand-backed LNG procurement, enforceable nominations, back-to-back take-or-pay discipline, ring-fenced RLNG actualisation, transparent monthly reconciliation, neutral transportation tariffs, transporter-seller separation, operational open access, private LNG participation and class-wise UFG benchmarking. Reform should preserve efficient, export-linked and high-recovery industrial CHP demand while assigning costs to the sector, decision or consumer class that caused them.

Prepared by Asim Riaz · Independent Energy Policy Assessment · For advocacy and policy discussion purposes only.